Tuesday, June 20, 2017

update on the new member of the Pontifical Academy Of Life — Rabbi Avraham Steinberg, M.D.




Why did Francis appoint two Talmudic Jews to the Pontifical Academy Of Life?  We at Call Me Jorge... believe the answer is a simple one, it is to further the process of Catholics continuing to look towards the rabbi as the ultimate authority in religion, ethics, and morals.  In this post we will focus on Rabbi Avraham Steinberg and his three-volume, Encyclopedia of Jewish Medical Ethics.  In two recent posts on twitter, by Maurice Pinay and gem, some of the diabolical insanity of the Talmudic religion contained in this work was exposed.  We have those citations below and several others we found while perusing the encyclopedia.  Keep in mind that Francis looks to Rabbi Avraham Steinberg and Talmudic Judaism as authorities.

According to wikipedia,
Rabbi Professor Avraham Steinberg MD (Hebrew אברהם שטינברג; born 25 August 1947) is a medical ethicist, pediatric neurologist, rabbi and editor of Talmudic literature.
Professor Steinberg is Director of the Medical Ethics Unit at Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, and co-chairman of the Israeli National Council on Bioethics. In 1999 he won the Israel Prize for original Rabbinic literature for his 7-volume Encyclopedia Hilchatit Refuit in Hebrew - the most comprehensive text book ever compiled on this subject. It was translated into English by Professor Fred Rosner as the Encyclopedia of Jewish Medical Ethics.[1]
Steinberg is Director of the Torah literature publishing group Yad HaRav Herzog, head of the Editorial Board of the Talmudic Encyclopedia (or Encyclopedia Talmudit) and Editor-in-Chief of the Talmudic Micropedia.



Excerpts from the Encyclopedia of Jewish Medical Ethics: by Rabbi Avraham Steinberg, M.D.





















The above is just a small sampling of the demented minds of the rabbis and their man-made traditions.  For our American readers who are worried about Sharia Law, where’s the concern about the Halakhic Law which is entering the Novus Ordo through the back door with Francis’ recent appointments such as this?  In a previous post we showed how Halakha already influences the American courts (see, R.I.P. Antonin ‘Nino’ Gregory Scalia).  Have the rank-and-file pew sitters been processed to the degree where they think that the above is acceptable to their Christian beliefs?  If not where is the outcry from anyone except for a few ‘voices...crying in the wilderness’ (John 1, 23)?


Related:

Monday, June 19, 2017

What was Francis reaction when he read this letter?


Francis and Cardinal Caffarra in a ‘spiritual hug’.


We at Call Me Jorge... wonder what Francis’ reaction was when he read the letter (see below) from Cardinal Carlo Caffarra on 25 April 2017.  We bet that not only did it get his heart going but that he had another outburst filled with profanity. Sandro Magister, who published the Portuguese original, still has his Vatican press credentials, as we write, but he may find himself on the receiving end of the wrath of ‘humble’ Francis once again.  The funniest part is when Caffarra assures Francis that the four cardinals believe Francis is the pope and not to worry they are not sedvacantists!  Anyway you slice it, its the same old Vatican game - a letter to Francis, followed by an explosion of ‘humble’ anger, then Francis pretending as if the letter didn’t exist, and ending with the letter being publicly aired like it was laundry by the frustrated letter writers.  It’s an elaborate ritual of saving face for all parties involved.  Ah, who could have predicted that Amoris Laetitia would become a sideshow at Francis’ macabre carnival?

“Most Holy Father,
It is with a certain trepidation that I address myself to Your Holiness, during these days of the Easter season. I do so on behalf of the Most Eminent Cardinals: Walter Brandmüller, Raymond L. Burke, Joachim Meisner, and myself.
We wish to begin by renewing our absolute dedication and our unconditional love for the Chair of Peter and for Your august person, in whom we recognize the Successor of Peter and the Vicar of Jesus: the “sweet Christ on earth,” as Saint Catherine of Siena was fond of saying. We do not share in the slightest the position of those who consider the See of Peter vacant, nor of those who want to attribute to others the indivisible responsibility of the Petrine munus. We are moved solely by the awareness of the grave responsibility arising from the munus of cardinals: to be advisers of the Successor of Peter in his sovereign ministry. And from the Sacrament of the Episcopate, which “has placed us as bishops to pasture the Church, which He has acquired with his blood” (Acts 20:28).
On September 19, 2016 we delivered to Your Holiness and to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith five dubia, asking You to resolve uncertainties and to bring clarity on some points of the post-synodal Apostolic Exhortation, Amoris Laetitia.
Not having received any response from Your Holiness, we have reached the decision to ask You, respectfully and humbly, for an Audience, together if Your Holiness would like. We attach, as is the practice, an Audience Sheet in which we present the two points we wish to discuss with you.
Most Holy Father,
A year has now gone by since the publication of Amoris Laetitia. During this time, interpretations of some objectively ambiguous passages of the post-synodal Exhortation have publicly been given that are not divergent from, but contrary to, the permanent Magisterium of the Church. Despite the fact that the Prefect of the Doctrine of the Faith has repeatedly declared that the doctrine of the Church has not changed, numerous statements have appeared from individual Bishops, Cardinals, and even Episcopal Conferences, approving what the Magisterium of the Church has never approved. Not only access to the Holy Eucharist for those who objectively and publicly live in a situation of grave sin, and intend to remain in it, but also a conception of moral conscience contrary to the Tradition of the Church. And so it is happening — how painful it is to see this! — that what is sin in Poland is good in Germany, that what is prohibited in the archdiocese of Philadelphia is permitted in Malta. And so on. One is reminded of the bitter observation of B. Pascal: “Justice on this side of the Pyrenees, injustice on the other; justice on the left bank of the river, injustice on the right bank.”
Numerous competent lay faithful, who are deeply in love with the Church and staunchly loyal to the Apostolic See, have turned to their Pastors and to Your Holiness in order to be confirmed in the Holy Doctrine concerning the three sacraments of Marriage, Confession, and the Eucharist. And in these very days, in Rome, six lay faithful, from every Continent, have presented a very well-attended study seminar with the meaningful title: “Bringing clarity.”
Faced with this grave situation, in which many Christian communities are being divided, we feel the weight of our responsibility, and our conscience impels us to ask humbly and respectfully for an Audience.
May Your Holiness remember us in Your prayers, as we pledge to remember You in ours. And we ask for the gift of Your Apostolic Blessing.
Carlo Card. Caffarra
Rome, April 25, 2017
Feast of Saint Mark the Evangelist
*
AUDIENCE SHEET
1. Request for clarification of the five points indicated by the dubia; reasons for this request.
2. Situation of confusion and disorientation, especially among pastors of souls, in primis parish priests.”
sources:  English translation — Edward Pentin, Full Text of Dubia Cardinals’ Letter Asking Pope for an Audience & Portuguese original — Sandro Magister, "A nossa consciência força-nos…"


 Who do these guys think they are?

Another personal video from Francis


This time to the Bishop of Gozo in Malta, Mario Grech, on the occasion of the inauguration of the mosaics of the Sanctuary of the Virgin of Ta 'Pinu.
video


Dear pilgrims,

I accept with joy the invitation to greet all of you who are today assembled at the Shrine of the Virgin of Ta 'Pinu, where a great embrace of mosaics awaits Jesus and his Mother.

The image of the churchyard, which today is inaugurated, lays before our eyes the beauty of a simple contemplative prayer, accessible to all, great and small: the prayer of the holy Rosary. I too often used the Rosary in front of a mosaic: a small mosaic of Our Lady with the Child, where Mary appears in the centre, while in reality, using her hands, she becomes a kind of ladder through which Jesus can descend in the midst of us. The centre is always Jesus, who lowers himself to walk with us men so that we can ascend into Heaven with Him.

In the Rosary prayer we turn to the Virgin Mary to bring us closer to her Son Jesus, to know him and to love him more and more. And while we repeat "Hail Mary," we meditate on the mysteries, the Joyful, luminous, sorrowful and glorious stages of Christ's life, but also of our lives: for we walk with the Lord. This simple prayer, in fact, helps us to contemplate all that God has done for us and for our salvation in his love, and makes us understand that our life is united to that of Christ. In prayer, we are giving everything to God: fatigue, hurt, fears, but also joys, gifts, people ... all to God. By praying, we allow God to enter into our time, to accept and transfigure all that we live. This powerful prayer of the Holy Rosary serves us often because it brings peace to hearts, to families, to the Church, and to the world.

And, please do not forget to pray for me. May the Lord bless you and the Virgin Mother protect you.

John Paul II would have had no problem with Amoris Laetitia


...as he gave communion to the twice divorced, thrice married, and famous Zen-Buddhist playboy conductor, Herbert von Karajan.






By now the five dubia of cardinals Caffarra, Burke, Brandmuller, and Meisner submitted to Francis should been seen for the side-show that they are.  Dubias #2, #4, and #5, all reference John Paul II’s Encyclical "Veritatis Splendor".  Why are they bringing up an encyclical which no one pays attention to, much less the author of it?   What speaks louder, the meaningless words of John Paul II or his actions?  Yes, John Paul II wrote this encyclical several years after the above video but we would bet that John Paul II continued to give communion to divorcees after it was written.  John Paul II never did public penance in reparation for this.  Why are the four cardinals pretending that John Paul II was anything other than a modernist?  This is duplicitous behavior on the part of the four cardinals.  How come none of the conservative religious media have pointed any of this out?



Amoris Laetitia is just another
hermeneutic of continuity!

Sunday, June 18, 2017

Francis is onboard with the noahide program of The Elijah Interfaith Institute


Francis and his Talmudic handler, Abraham Skorka



This video was made under the auspices of The Elijah Interfaith Institute.  This institute was founded in 1996 by the the crypto-haredi rabbi, Alon Goshen-Gottstein who specializes in Talmud, Jewish thought, and interreligious dialogue; and is financed by the the UNESCO agency of the United Nations.  It is headquartered in Jerusalem and its purpose is to make good noahides out of all the myriad of religions in the world.  They believe that all idol-worship (including what passes for Christianity today) is okay as long as it is subordinate to Talmudic Judaism.  The Elijah Interfaith Institute is also heavily into mysticism and the occult.

Notice in the video the mentions of:
  • dialogue — the code word for the one-way street with the Novus Ordo goose-stepping to the dictates of the Talmudic Jews;
  • criticism of authority — in the Talmudic religion this means correcting God’s errors;
  • ongoing projects of Francis & Skorka;
  • Francis learned to be a better Catholic through dialogue — study of the blasphemous Talmud and satanic Kabbalah;
  • encounter — two facets of which were explained so well by the triple agent con-man, Malachi Martin, this means inviting rabbis to teach their false doctrines at Catholic schools and destroy Roman Catholic Hebraeophobia;
  • Francis has preached in Skorka’s synagogue twice — put on your surprise face, as Francis regularly celebrates Talmudic holidays;
  • Francis’ friendship with Skorka made him richer because the rabbi explained the answers to his religious questions — Francis mentions specifically, revelation;
  • the pair are a model of where dialogue can take one — straight to apostasy!;
  • they believe God is responsible for their friendship and dialogue; and
  • neither one of them has attempted to convert the other one — Francis doesn’t need to convert, as he’s a walking talking blasphemous rabbi who is regularly uttering heresies.

This video and the remaining twenty produced by The Elijah Interfaith Institute are anti-Catholic in the highest sense of the word.  Taken together they preach a form of gnostic perennialism under the umbrella of the rabbinic talmudists.  This goes against what Francis is supposed to be representing on earth as the ‘Vicar of Christ’.
“Bear not the yoke with unbelievers. For what participation hath justice with injustice? Or what fellowship hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? Or what part hath the faithful with the unbeliever? And what agreement hath the temple of God with idols? For you are the temple of the living God; as God saith: I will dwell in them, and walk among them; and I will be their God, and they shall be my people. Wherefore, Go out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing: And I will receive you; and I will be a Father to you; and you shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.”
source: The Second Epistle to the Corinthians 6, 14-18

Let’s return for a few minutes to The Elijah Interfaith Institute.  The name of the institute is a very interesting one.  For Catholics, in the Old Testament (see Kings) the prophet Elias was opposed to idol worship and the prophets of Baal.  Talmudic Judaism sees Elijah in quite a different manner.

Talmudists believe that Elijah witnesses the bris (brit milah or circumcision) the seal of the old covenant (which has been superseded by the New Covenant).
“Since medieval times, when a brit milah is performed, a chair is set aside for Elijah, the “Angel of the Covenant,” who is believed to be present at every brit milah.”
source: Geoffrey W. Dennis, “The Encyclopedia of Jewish Myth, Magic and Mysticism” e-book, p. 119

He also makes an ‘appearance’ at the anti-Christian Seder Meal:
Another ritual involving cursing the Gentiles is the famous custom of reciting "Pour Out Thy Wrath" (Shefokh hamatkha) at the Passover seder ... It's earliest mention appears in Mahzor Vitry ... This section of the [Passover] Haggadah is understood by the participants as closely connected with the future Redemption. Opening the door to the prophet Elijah in tandem with the prayer for vengeance signifies a connection between vengeance against the Gentiles and the appearance of the Messiah. It should also be noted that this section of the Haggadah is recited as an introduction to the fourth and last cup of wine, the cup of deliverance ...
[...]
The messianic content of "Pour Out Thy Wrath" was illustrated in illuminated Ashkenazic Haggadot through pictures depicting the Messiah riding on a donkey with Elijah by his side, proclaiming his coming. [Antonius] Margarita ... relates the popular Jewish exegesis of the Messiah's donkey ...
I think that I myself sincerely believed the lies told below. Blessed be God and the Holy Spirit, who saved me from such and other errors. According to the lies of the Jews, when the Messiah comes he will ride upon an ass and seat all Jews upon the ass, while all Christians will sit on the ass's tail. Then the Messiah will ride with all his passengers into the sea, and when he comes to the depths of the sea, the donkey will drop its tail and all the Christians will fall into the sea and drown. And indeed, this will have to be a very big ass. But an even bigger ass is a person who believes such things! (Antonius Margarita, Ein kurner Bericht und Anzaigung [Wien, 1541], fol. IIv).
source: Two Nations in Your Womb - Israel Jacob Yuval, pp.123-125

Talmudists believe that Elijah teaches that non-Jews don’t have souls:


source: The Talmud, The Steinsaltz Edition, Tractate Bava Metzia 114b

Elijah announces to the rabbis that they have defeated God:
...when Rabbi Yehoshua refused to heed the heavenly voice. Elijah the Prophet responded, “God smiled and said, ‘My sons have defeated me! My sons have defeated me!’” In Hebrew, the echoing sentence is “Nitzjuni banai! Nitzjuni banai!”
source: The Common, Talmudic Lesson: God’s Smile

The Talmudic rabbis teach that Elijah blamed God for Israel’s apostasy and God thought Elijah correct:


source: Pious Irreverence: Confronting God in Rabbinic Judaism by Dov Weiss, p. 70

Elijah is thought to be the teacher of secret doctrines (Kabbalah) to the rabbis:
The mystics and cabalists of all times frequently appealed to Elijah as their patron. Among them was the gaon Joseph, of whom it was said that Elijah was a daily visitor at his academy (First Epistle of Sherira, ed. Neubauer, p. 32). The introduction of the Cabala to Provence is traced directly to Elijah, who revealed the secret doctrine to Jacob ha-Nozer. Similarly Abraham b. Isaac and Abraham ben David of Posquières are mentioned as privileged ones, to whom Elijah appeared (see Jellinek, "Auswahl Kabbalistischer Mystik," pp. 4, 5). The pseudonymous author of the "Ḳanah" asserted that he had received his teachings directly from Elijah. In the Zohar, Simon ben Yoḥai and his son Eleazar are mentioned as among those who enjoyed the special friendship of Elijah. This work, as well as the Tiḳḳun Zohar and the Zohar Ḥadash, contains muchthat is ascribed to Elijah (compare Friedmann, "Seder Eliyahu Rabba we-Seder Eliyahu Zuṭa," pp. 38-41). When, toward the middle of the fourteenth century, the Cabala received new prominence in Palestine, Elijah again took a leading part. Joseph de la Regna asks Elijah's advice in his combat with Satan. The father of the new cabalistic school, Isaac Luria, was visited by Elijah before his son was born. In like manner, the father of Israel Ba'al Shem-Ṭob received the good news from Elijah that a son would be born unto him, "who would be a light in Israel" ("Ma'asiyyot Peliot," pp. 24, 25, Cracow, 1896, which contains an interesting narrative of Elijah's meeting with the father of Ba'al Shem-Ṭob).
source: Jewish Encylopedia (1906), Volume 5, pp. 125-6, entry ELIJAH ()

We could go on but we believe the reader has an idea of what the Elijah of the Talmudic Jews represents and that he has little to do with the prophet Elias of the Old Testament.  Is it beginning to sink in how bad Francis and his rabbinical buddies are?

Below are the religious leaders who made videos for The Elijah Interfaith Institute.  It’s a motley crew of anti-Christs who all long to see the contrivances of the Talmudic rabbis implemented through the nightmare of noahidism.

  • Grand Mufti Shawki Allam
  • Ven. Chân Không
  • H.H. the Dalai Lama
  • Swami Chidananda
  • Dharma Master Hsin Tao
  • Pope Francis
  • Chief Rabbi David Lau
  • Ven. Khandro Rinpoche
  • Swami Suhitananda
  • Sri Sri Ravi Shankar
  • Rabbi Abraham Skorka
  • Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I
  • Mata Amritanandamayi (Amma)
  • Ayatollah Sayyid Fadhel Al-Milani
  • Imam Dr. Adamou Ndam Njoya
  • Ayatollah Sayyid Hassan Al-Qazwini
  • Archbishop Antje Jackelén
  • Archbishop Justin Welby
  • Shaykh Hamza Yusuf
  • Bhai Sahib Mohinder Singh
  • Chief Rabbi Jonathan Sacks
  • Swami Ramdev

Excerpts from the above mentioned videos.


What Francis can learn from the Talmudic Jews


‘Solve et coagula’ the past and the present



Has Francis taken this advice?

Francis appoints two Talmudic rabbis as members of the Pontifical Academy Of Life


Avraham Steinberg gives President Reuven Rivlin the Talmudic Encyclopedia Volume 
at an event in honor of the 70th anniversary of the Encyclopedia, January 2016


Professor Avraham STEINBERG, Director of the Medical Ethics Unit of the Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Director of the Editorial Committee of the Talmudic Encyclopedia (Israel);

Professor Fernando SZLAJEN, Rabbi, Director of the Department of Culture of the Asociación Mutual Israelita Argentina, Professor in the Department of Philosophy and Letters at the University of Buenos Aires (Argentina);

source: Bollettino, Resignations and Appointments, 13.06.2017 




Rabbi Fernando Szlajen on the 49th Anniversary of Yom Yerushalayim (Jerusalem Day), commemorating the re-unification of Jerusalem as the eternal capital of the Jewish people and on the eve of Shavuot 5776.


Two rabbis, one from Israel and one from Argentina, were appointed by Pope Francis to the Pontifical Academy of Life, the first time rabbis have been invited to be members of the academy.

Pope Francis appointed 45 new ordinary members and five honorary members to the academy’s advisory body, the Vatican announced last week.

Israeli rabbi Avraham Steinberg, who won the Israel Prize in 1999 for original rabbinic literature, and Argentinean rabbi Fernando Szlajen were designated on June 13 as members of the institution that “exists for the promotion and defense of human life, especially regarding bioethics as it regards Christian morality.”

Rabbi Steinberg is the author of “The Encyclopedia of Jewish Medical Ethics,” for which he was awarded the Israel Prize in 1999. He is the director of the Medical Ethics Unit of the Shaare Tzedek Medical Center in Jerusalem, and director of the Editorial Committee of the Talmudic Encyclopedia.

Rabbi Szlajen, who is from Argentina, the birth country of Pope Francis, is the director of the Department of Culture for the AMIA Jewish community center in Buenos Aires and a professor in the Department of Philosophy and Letters at the University of Buenos Aires.

source: Forward, In First, Pope Francis Names Rabbis To Pontifical Academy Of Life

Thursday, June 15, 2017

Francis writes preface to book by Cardinal Peter Turkson



The mask if off and all should be able to see Francis for the humanist gnostic that he is.


Corrosione Combattere La Corruzione Nella Chiesa E Nella Societa
by Cardinal Peter Turkson
(Corrosion: Fighting Corruption In The Church And In Society)


(Due to time considerations, Call Me Jorge... used an online translator for the text below and cleaned it up slightly.  We did read it in its original Italian and the translation reflects the Italian.)



Preface by Francis

Corruption, in its etymological root, defines a laceration, a break, a decomposition and disintegration. Whether as inner state or as a social fact, its action can be understood by looking at the relationships that man in his deepest nature. The human being has, a relationship with God, a relationship with his neighbor, a relationship with creation, that is the environment in which he lives. This triple relationship - which is also part of the man himself - gives context and meaning to his acts and, in general, to his life.

Corruption

When man meets the needs of these relationships it is honest, he assumes responsibilities with uprightness of heart and works for the common good. But when he suffers a fall, that is imperishable, these relationships are torn. Thus, corruption expresses the general shape of the disordered life of fallen man. At the same time, even as a result of the fall, corruption reveals an anti-social conduct strong enough to melt the validity of the relationships and then, later, the pillars which underpin a society: the coexistence of people and the vocations which develop it. Corruption breaks all this by replacing the common good with a particular interest that contaminates every general perspective. It arises from a corrupt heart, and is the worst social problem, because it creates very serious problems and crimes involving everyone. The word “corrupt” recalls broken hearts, a broken heart, stained by something, like a ruined body that naturally enters a process of decay and stench.

At the origin of injustice

What's the origin of man's exploitation? What, at the origin of the degradation and the lack of development? What, is at the origin of trafficking in persons, arms, drugs? What, is at the origin of social injustice and the humiliation of merit? What, is at the origin of the absence of services for people? What, is at the root of slavery, unemployment, neglect of the city of common goods and nature? What, in short, wears the fundamental right of the human being and the integrity of the environment? Corruption, which is in fact the weapon, it is also the most common language of the mafias and criminal organizations in the world. For this, it is a process of death that gives life to the culture of death of the mafias and criminal organizations. There is a deep cultural issue that should be addressed. Today most people can not even imagine the future; Today it is difficult for a young man to truly believe in its future, any future, and so for his family. This our change of era, a very wide crisis, it portrays the deepest crisis involving our culture. In this context it should be seen and understood as corruption in its various aspects. It is the presence of hope in the world, without which life loses that sense of inquiry and possibilities for improvement that makes it so.

The man should be seen in every aspect

In this book, Cardinal Peter Turkson, now prefect of the Congregation for the Service of Human Integral Development, and former president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, explains well the ramification of these meanings of corruption, and does so with a particular focus on the inner origin of this, which in fact, germinates in the human heart and can take root in the hearts of all men. We are, in fact, all very exposed to the temptation of corruption and even when we think we have it defeated, it may reoccur. Man should be seen in all his aspects, he can not be divorced according from his activity, and so corruption is to be read - as we read in this book - all at once, for the whole man, both in his expressions of crime in the political, economic, cultural, and spiritual. In 2016 he ended the extraordinary ‘Jubilee of Mercy’. The mercy allows one too overcome themsleves in the spirit of searching. What if one arises in oneself and if one’s mind and heart do not explore a wider horizon?  There is the corrupt, and corrupting assumes the triumphalist attitude of those who feel smarter and more cunning than others. The corrupt person, however, does not realize that he are building, by himself, his own chains. A sinner can ask for forgiveness, a corrupter forgets to ask.  Because? Because he no longer needs to go further, to look for paths beyond himself: he is tired but full of himself. Corruption has, in fact, caused a fatigue of transcendence, as indifference.

The identity and the path of the Church
Cardinal Turkson - as we understand from this dialogue that is evolving according to a precise itinerary - explores the various steps in which corruption [exisits], humanity's spirituality and social, cultural, political and even criminal; putting these aspects together on what is most touched upon: the identity and path of the Church. The Church must listen, raise and bend over the sorrows and hopes of people according to mercy, and must do so without fear of purifying itself, assiduously seeking ways to improve itself. Henri de Lubac wrote that the greatest danger for the Church is that of spiritual worldliness - thus corruption - which is more disastrous than the infamous leprosy. Our corruption is the spiritual elegance, the lukewarmness, the hypocrisy, the triumphalism, the only spirit to prevail in the world on our lives, the sense of indifference. It is with this awareness that we, men and women of the Church, we can take ourselves and suffering humanity, especially one that is oppressed by the criminal consequences and degradation generated by corruption.

Christians, like snowflakes

As I write this, I am here in the Vatican, in a place of absolute beauty, in which human ingenuity has sought to elevate and transcend in an attempt to win the immortal over the fallen, the corrupt. This beauty is not a cosmetic accessory, but it something that puts the human person in the center so that it can uplift all the injustices. This beauty has to marry with justice. Thus, we must talk about corruption, denounce its evils, understand it, show the will to assert mercy towards meanness, curiosity and creativity towards the resigned weariness, the beauty towards nothing. We, Christians and non-Christians, are snow flakes, but if we united we can become an avalanche: a strong and constructive movement. Here is the new humanism, this renaissance, this re-creation against corruption that we can accomplish with prophetic audacity. We must all work together, Christians, non-Christians, people of all faiths and non-believers, to fight this form of blasphemy, this cancer that is wasting our lives. It is urgent to take notice of it, and this is why we need merciful education and culture, it requires cooperation on the part of everyone according to their own possibilities, their talents, their creativity.


Francis needs to look in a mirror and start with the blasphemies which come from his mouth, such as the Holy Trinity is always arguing but putting on a show of unity, which strike directly at the root of the Catholic Faith.

Wednesday, June 14, 2017

Talmudists preparing ‘love bombs’ for Palestinians in Gaza


The marriage of Talmud & State in the
terrorist entity known as Israel
                                 



Related:

Kabuki — Come Together Fight Back


Feel the Bern...
video



CNN’s Democratic Presidential Town Hall 
in Columbus, Ohio (13 March 2016)

SANDERS: That is unacceptable, and I think that Senator Rubio has a legitimate concern. We have got to put an end to this. Trump has to get on the TV and tell his supporters that violence in the political process in America is not acceptable, end of discussion.
TAPPER: One second, Roland, I'm sorry, I just want to play devil's advocate for one second on this. Some of your supporters in Chicago were acting violently as well, and I have to say the guy who rushed the stage yesterday at Donald Trump voted for you.
Now I know you are not encouraging - I know you are not encouraging the violence, but do you need to tell your supporters…
SANDERS: Jake millions of people voted for me, if I have to take responsibility for everybody who voted for me, it will be a very difficult life.
(LAUGHTER)

(click images to enlarge)






More:

Tuesday, June 13, 2017

Francis adds three more beatitudes to his growing list




Today the Vatican released the Message of Francis concerning his upcoming inaugural First World Day of the Poor to be celebrated on 19 November 2017.  In the document, Francis give the Novus Ordo three additional ‘beatitudes’.

  • Blessed... are the open hands that embrace the poor and help them: they are hands that bring hope. 
  • Blessed are the hands that reach beyond every barrier of culture, religion and nationality, and pour the balm of consolation over the wounds of humanity. 
  • Blessed are the open hands that ask nothing in exchange, with no “ifs” or “buts” or “maybes”: they are hands that call down God’s blessing upon their brothers and sisters.


More of the modernist dross that fits right in with Francis’ previous new ‘beatitudes’.


More of Francis’ beatitudes

the new evangelization in Lebanon


syncretistic perennialism with the Knights of Malta

the day Saint John Paul II was exorcised by a Mexican witch doctor


“To this day, I recall being in Mexico City with John Paul II in 2002 for the canonization Mass of Juan Diego, and watching a female Mexican shaman perform a dancing purification ritual on the pontiff with a bit of shrubbery during the Mass - in effect, the witch doctor exorcised John Paul. (Marini later explained that the ritual is part of traditional Mexican religiosity, arguing there’s a time-honored thrust in Christianity to “baptize” such expressions of popular faith.)”

— John L. Allen writing in New parlor game


witchcraft incorporated into the new rite by a future saint



the entire mess



Related:

Monday, June 12, 2017

the illogic of the SSPX





The ‘Year of Mercy’ is over!




On May 31st, Francis issued a letter through his Dean of the College of Cardinals, Cardinal Angelo Sodano, asking for the cardinals to inform Francis “by way of the Secretariat of State, the period of their absence from Rome and the address of their stay” because it’s “tradition”.  Is someone fearful of a coup d’etat?

(translation of letter)
DEAN OF THE COLLEGE OF CARDINALS

From the Vatican, May 31, 2017


N. 122/2017


Your Eminence,


A noble tradition has always led the Fellow Cardinals residing "in Urbe" to inform the Holy Father, by way of the Secretariat of State, the period of their absence from Rome and the address of their stay.

Pope Francis has recently requested of the Dean of the Cardinalatial College to fraternally remind each single Cardinal the opportunity of keeping that practice, even more so in the case of an extended absence from Rome.

From my part, I gladly fulfill this venerable assignment, assured of the fullest consideration that it will be given.

Finally, I take the opportunity to greet you in the Lord and wish you all the best.

+ Angelo Card. Sodano


___________
To the Eminent Lord Cardinals
resident in Rome




On June 8th, Francis had a private audience audience with a delegation from the Nigerian Diocese of Ahiara. Francis said he was “deeply saddened” by the refusal of the diocese to accept the bishop appointed for them, Peter Ebere Okpaleke, who was appointed to Ahiara by Benedict XVI in 2012. Here’s Francis’ full statement:


Words of the Francis to the members of the delegation of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Ahiara (June 8), 06/10/2017
I cordially greet the delegation and thank you for coming from Nigeria in a spirit of pilgrimage.
For me, this meeting is a consolation Because I am deeply saddened by the events of the Church in Ahiara.
In fact, the Church (and excuse the wording) is like a widow for having the Bishop Prevented from coming to the Diocese. Many times I have thought about the parable of the murderous tenants, of which the Gospel speaks (cf. Mt 21: 33-44), That want to grasp the inheritance. In this current situation the Diocese of Ahiara is without the bridegroom, has lost her fertility and can not bear fruit. Whoever was opposed to Bishop Okpaleke taking possession of the Diocese wants to destroy the Church. This is forbidden; perhaps he does not realize it, but the Church is suffering as well as the People of God Within her. The Pope can not be indifferent.
I know very well the events That sono stati dragging on for years and I am thankful for the great patience of the attitude of Bishop, indeed the holy patience Demonstrated by him. I listened and reflected much, even about the Possibility of suppressing the Diocese, but then I thought That the Church is a mother and can not abandon her many children. I feel great sorrow for Those priests who are being manipulated from abroad and even from outside the Diocese.
That I think, in this case, we are not dealing with tribalism, but with an attempted taking of the vineyard of the Lord. The Church is a mother and whoever offends her commits a mortal sin, it's very serious. However, I Decided not to suppress the Diocese. Instead, I wish to give some indications That Are to be Communicated to all: first of all it must be said That the Pope is deeply saddened. Therefore, I ask That every priest or ecclesiastic incardinated in the Diocese of Ahiara, there Whether he resides or works elsewhere, even abroad, write a letter addressed to me in cui he asks for forgiveness; all must write individually and personally. We all must share this common sorrow.
In the letter
1.  Clearly one must manifest total obedience to the Pope, and
2.  whoever writes must be willing to accept the Bishop-whom the Pope sends and has appointed.
3.  The letter must be sent Within 30 days, from today to July 9th, 2017. Whoever does not do this will be ipso facto suspended a divinis and will lose His current office.
This Seems very hard, but why must the Pope do this? Because the people of God are scandalized. Jesus reminds us That whoever causes scandal must suffer the Consequences. Maybe someone Has Been manipulated without having full awareness of the wound inflicted upon the ecclesial communion.
To you brothers and sisters, I would like to express my sincere thanks for your presence; And Also to Cardinal Onaiyekan For His patience and to Bishop Okpaleke, Whose patience and humility I admire. Thank you all.
[00905-EN.01] [Original text: Italian]
[B0403-XX.01]

source: Vatican, Parole del Franciscus ai Membri della Delegazione della Diocesi di Ahiara (8 giugno), 10.06.2017


See, Francis can act all ‘papal’ 

and 

‘traditional’ when it suits him!



video